Saturday, June 18, 2016

Steph Curry's MVP Unanimous Award Means Nothing During The Playoffs

Sometimes, in an argument, people will get stuck on a particular fact and forget what they are actually arguing about. During the NBA Playoffs, Stephen Curry, the MVP of the 2016 regular season has been struggling while Lebron James, arguably the most skilled player in the league, has played at an extraordinarily high level, seemingly better than he ever has in the playoffs. Because of this, people have questioned how Curry could have been unanimously voted as the league’s MVP if he isn’t even the best player in the league.

At the end of the 2015-16 NBA season, Stephen Curry was unanimously voted as the league’s Most Valuable Player, his second such award in the last two seasons. Curry became the first player to receive every first place MVP vote, which, for those who ask the question of how he became the first unanimous MVP, is how he became the first unanimous NBA MVP. Curry had a tremendous season; he led the league in scoring and led his team to a record 73 wins. As a result, everyone who had an MVP vote thought that Curry deserved their first place vote, making him the first unanimous MVP. However, while people are debating his performance in the playoffs, they supplement their arguments with their belief that Curry didn’t deserve to be the unanimous MVP, as if receiving all of the first place votes makes his MVP award greater than when Shaq won it in 2000 with all but one vote.

In discussing whether or not Curry is the most skilled player in the league, is the player having the best playoff run, or even who might wind up with the NBA Finals MVP Award, the fact that he received every vote for the regular season MVP award is irrelevant. Curry is the regular season MVP, and is attempting to win the MVP award and the NBA title for only the 24th time in 61 NBA titles (the first title was 1950 but the first league MVP was 1956). However, since the regular season MVP has won the NBA title only 23 previous times in 61 tries means that the MVP seldom has the most impact on the NBA Championship. In fact, only 14 times has the league MVP also been the Finals MVP, and four of those were Michael Jordan. Therefore, it would not be uncommon for the regular season MVP, unanimous or otherwise, to not be the best player in the NBA Finals.


Steph Curry might win the NBA Championship he might not. Either way, his performance during the playoffs has no bearing on the fact that he won the 2015-16, regular season NBA Most Valuable Player Award. The fact that he received all 131 first place votes does not make his award any more or less special, and does not make him any more or less of a player. Just like stock brokers say when they warn potential investors, past results have no bearing on future performance. 

No comments:

Post a Comment